Monday, November 5, 2012
Disney, Star Wars, Philanthropy, SuperTeaching
As a kid, I collected Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi trading cards. I had action figures, and a subscription to Bantha Tracks, the official LucasFilm magazine at the time. I think Empire Strikes Back was the first movie I ever saw after a re-release of Bambi. I also had a personal connection to the last of the three movies because my name is Jed, so one of the nicknames that has stuck with me for life is Jedi.
Years later I was privileged to watch prequel Episodes 1, 2, 3 and look forward to doing so again in 3D.
I knew all about Episodes 7, 8, and 9 because they were the plan all along, but rumor had it George Lucas had squeezed 7, 8, and 9 into the ending of Return of the Jedi, so they might never come out.
Star Wars and Indiana Jones were my favorite galaxies growing up. My uncles watched Star Trek, but I considered it a cheap rip off of the real thing. Star Wars was my Harry Potter, my Hunger Games.
You can imagine my surprise and delight when Disney announced its purchase of LucasFilm for $4 billion last week. Not only does Star Wars have a new owner, but there WILL be an Episode 7 in 2015, with Episodes 8 and 9 not long after.
Was it a smart purchase? Is this a franchise still worth $4 billion after 37 years? Absolutely, and if anyone can make the most of it, it is Disney.
We should have seen the signs already the year Star Wars came out. "Princess" Leia? Then in 1997 we met Queen Amidala. I wonder how Natalie Portman and Carrie Fisher feel about being Disney Princesses?
Meanwhile, George Lucas is moving on to a whole new world of philanthropy. George plans to invest heavily in education through his non-profit Edutopia.org.
http://www.edutopia.org/
If I could suggest a technology for him to work with and expand on, it would be Super Teaching.
http://superteaching.org/
I've experienced the benefits of this new technology myself in the adult, entrepreneurial education forum called CEO Space International. SuperTeaching is a post-space age educational technology that should be in classrooms everywhere. (Get well soon, NASA!)
One of my plans for the next week is to introduce the two organizations. Watch for a call and written contact from Berny Dohrmann, Edutopia!
Last week's deal will go down in history as not only significant to Disney and those who love Star Wars, but to the future of millions of kids, yours and mine. Maybe this week's introduction will add even more to Lucas' legacy? May the Force be with us!
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Approachability
I've been listening to an audiobook called The Six Laws of Approachability by Laura Stack. You can listen to the audiobook here:
http://www.audible.com/pd?asin=B009UWL6KW
Laura shares six main tips:
1. Broadcast a positive, confident image.
2. Follow proper etiquette in handshake, introductions, and dress.
3. Give yourself confident credit.
4. Model enthusiasm and a positive attitude.
5. The face is the window to your soul, especially eyes and smile.
6. Use a clear, audible, enthusiastic, positive voice.
The story that impresses me the most is an anecdote from Southwest Airlines' hiring practices. The company found that 95% of their complaints came from 5% of their people, so they started to build their interview process around two main factors:
1. Did the person smile at least three times during the first interview?
2. Is the person self centered or customer centered? How do they show support?
Focusing on these two attributes cut the level of Southwest's customer complaints by 98%.
How might such attributes help you 1) get hired or 2) hire the right people?
If you haven't already read them, I recommend two other books for developing strong social skills and speaking ability:
How to Win Friends and Influence People in the Digital Age by Dale Carnegie
http://www.audible.com/pd?asin=B005MKCFCE
Speak Like Lincoln, Stand Like Churchill by James C. Humes
http://www.audible.com/pd?asin=B005ET6SX0
If you are hiring at a studio or as a producer, here are two questions to ask that might make a multi-million dollar difference in your business:
What if the actors in your film smiled a bit more. Would that impact people's perception of your film?
How might your film make the audience smile?
Remember, the audience is paying your salary and your bonus check.
The bottom line is an inch or two above their chin.
Pleasantly and profitably yours,
Jed.
http://www.EntertainAndInspire.com
Saturday, October 13, 2012
How to Get Your iPhone, iPod Touch or iPad App Into the Top 25
A year or two ago, I created my first iPhone app, Private Money App, as a way for real estate investors to get hard money for their real estate deals. I learned a lot from the process, and the app continues to see downloads and create business to this day.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/private-money-app/id408237861?mt=8
Last week, my brother Ben Merrill released his first app for the iPad called Concepts. The app is far more ambitious and expensive than mine. He spent many months and at least $75,000 to develop it.
http://concepts.tophatch.com/
Here's a video of the app in action, directed by movie director Dave Skousen:
http://youtu.be/VrPd6wDUWlY
Rewind two weeks.
In late September, I was at CEO Space International's Free Enterprise Forum in Las Vegas. A few days into the week-long forum, I overheard someone talking about what it takes to get into the Top 25 on Apple's App Store. The person directed me to another table where Wes Chapman of GetLimed.com was leading a discussion. The table was full, but I caught up with Wes later in the day and we talked for half an hour. On Saturday, he taught a workshop on building and marketing apps, and I passed on the information to my brother.
The result? While my brother's app is not in the Top 25 yet, within a week of release and without doing half of the steps, Concepts was chosen as New and Noteworthy by Apple.
I'd really like to say what the steps are to get into New and Noteworthy (as opposed to the Top 25), but that is really more of an art than a science. My brother deserves 100% of the credit for putting together a really top quality app that appeals to Apple and will be fun and useful for millions of people.
Getting into the Top 25 is both simpler and more expensive than getting picked for New and Noteworthy. Give away or sell apps! You have to get a lot of downloads in a single day, about 26,000 at present, to break into the top ranks.
There are a number of ways to do this, most of which cost money. One that I have seen work over and over again, especially with free apps, is TapJoy. There are many other models, like offering your paid app for free for a day via FreeAppADay.com and other promotional pages. Getting noticed by the media also helps drive downloads. Getting noticed by major media often begins with paying to be featured on an app review site like 148 Apps. Here is a link to more than 150 other blogs that might feature or review your app:
http://maniacdev.com/2012/05/ios-app-review-sites/
If your app is for the Mac App Store rather than iOS, I suggest TwoDollarTues.com to rocket your app into the top 50.
If you have an iPad, I strongly recommend trying out my brother's app Concepts, currently a free app, and upgrading for $2 to precision mode. It's really a steal at that price, and I am telling Ben it should be at least $5 for what it offers. There are some really cool updates planned that Apple doesn't know about, but will really show off what the iPad can do.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/concepts/id560586497
Profitably yours,
Jed.
Music, Marketing, and How to Get Your Music on Pandora
Two years ago, I helped a friend get his first ten songs on iTunes using TuneCore. I think most people hope that iTunes and other new forms of digital distribution will open up a whole new base of fans and listeners, but that did not work out for my friend. While he definitely sold music, he never got a check, and most of his sales came from his own referrals, people he told to look for him on iTunes. Today he prefers to sell a CD face to face so he doesn't have to worry about getting a check in one, three or six months.
Getting on iTunes, or any digital distribution platform, is only half of getting your music into the hands, in front of the eyes or inside the ears of a consumer. The other half is marketing.
In the old days, we would buy our music in a store. We could touch the CD, or at least its packaging, admire the artwork, and sometimes even listen to the music before buying, depending on the store's technology level.
Today we can distribute our music online for almost nothing, but it is easy to forget that availability, even in an online catalog the size of iTunes, does not mean visibility. If you are not on page one and if people don't know to search for you, you may as well be on page infinity. Your music is not going to be found, let alone purchased!
How does one overcome this obstacle? How can one get one's music into the ear buds of a music hungry consumer if one is not in the same physical space? Paying big bucks for a billboard won't tell a consumer how good a song sounds. What is a talented, but unknown artist to do?
The thought came to me, what would it take to get my friend's masterpieces on Pandora? Pandora Internet Radio helps listeners explore music starting with one song, with the following songs bearing some subjective or logical relation to the palate required to like the first song.
I took my search to the Internet, and there are actually a lot of people willing to give answers, but the best advice is by Pandora’s "Music Curator" Michael Zapruder who has a blog on CDBaby.com.
http://diymusician.cdbaby.com/2010/08/how-to-get-your-music-into-pandora/
I won't regurgitate everything he says, but I will point you to this well hidden link on Pandora's website where you can have your music reviewed if you meet basic qualifications, like a valid UPC code.
http://submitmusic.pandora.com/
Searching further, I came across a survey that asks if you would like to see an easy, perhaps paid, way to get on Pandora. While easy pay for placement is not currently an option, I suggest making your voice heard if you want a shortcut way to submit!
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/508209/84b3683a474d
Thanks for reading!
Getting on iTunes, or any digital distribution platform, is only half of getting your music into the hands, in front of the eyes or inside the ears of a consumer. The other half is marketing.
In the old days, we would buy our music in a store. We could touch the CD, or at least its packaging, admire the artwork, and sometimes even listen to the music before buying, depending on the store's technology level.
Today we can distribute our music online for almost nothing, but it is easy to forget that availability, even in an online catalog the size of iTunes, does not mean visibility. If you are not on page one and if people don't know to search for you, you may as well be on page infinity. Your music is not going to be found, let alone purchased!
How does one overcome this obstacle? How can one get one's music into the ear buds of a music hungry consumer if one is not in the same physical space? Paying big bucks for a billboard won't tell a consumer how good a song sounds. What is a talented, but unknown artist to do?
The thought came to me, what would it take to get my friend's masterpieces on Pandora? Pandora Internet Radio helps listeners explore music starting with one song, with the following songs bearing some subjective or logical relation to the palate required to like the first song.
I took my search to the Internet, and there are actually a lot of people willing to give answers, but the best advice is by Pandora’s "Music Curator" Michael Zapruder who has a blog on CDBaby.com.
http://diymusician.cdbaby.com/2010/08/how-to-get-your-music-into-pandora/
I won't regurgitate everything he says, but I will point you to this well hidden link on Pandora's website where you can have your music reviewed if you meet basic qualifications, like a valid UPC code.
http://submitmusic.pandora.com/
Searching further, I came across a survey that asks if you would like to see an easy, perhaps paid, way to get on Pandora. While easy pay for placement is not currently an option, I suggest making your voice heard if you want a shortcut way to submit!
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/508209/84b3683a474d
Thanks for reading!
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Entertainment Law Podcasts
This week I discovered Gordon Firemark's Entertainment Law Update Podcast series. I've listened to three episodes so far:
Firemark, G. (2012, February 1). Episode 28 - Political campaigns, combat helicopters, and Batmobiles. Entertainment Law Update Podcast. Podcast retrieved from iTunes.
Firemark, G. (2012, March 29). Episode 29 - 360 deals, rights of publicity, and more. Entertainment Law Update Podcast. Podcast retrieved from iTunes.
Firemark, G. (2012, April 29). Episode 30 - JOBS Act, crowdfunding, limited editions. Entertainment Law Update Podcast. Podcast retrieved from iTunes.
One can learn a lot from experienced entertainment attorneys like Gordon. Several lessons stood out from the three podcasts.
While my company has not been involved in production of the Batman films, I did meet the person who built the Batmobile for The Dark Knight. He was very proud of the design, and said he would let me see it. He also created the Speed Racer car, which I did get to see in person. In Episode 28, Mr. Firemark discusses legal issues that arose when a company made and sold Batmobile lookalikes. The company claimed it was a fair use because the vehicle was functional and therefore not subject to trademark law, but the courts decided certain features of a vehicle’s design could be trademarked. Therefore, it is necessary to license a unique design before producing and selling a lookalike vehicle. My question is, who owns the right to the Batmobile likeness, the comic creator or the person/vehicle artist who made the Batmobile car for the movie? This is a question I should consider if I hire this person to build cars for future films.
Episode 29 deals with 360 deals. Some record companies are in trouble for charging fees for putting together an entire 360 deal, when their contracts only entitle them to commissions on part of the deal. In one case, charging the fee led to canceling of the entire contract and loss of all fees, but this does not appear to be the trend. It is important for my company to make sure any fees are fully outlined in my contracts, so I don’t invalidate my contract by charging a fee that is not allowed. This is just one more reason why a good entertainment attorney should be involved in any major transaction.
One option my company has looked at for funding certain projects is crowd funding. Episode 30 discusses the JOBS Act (Jumpstart Our Business Startups), which is intended to jumpstart businesses through crowd funding. Mr. Firemark goes through the many challenges that are currently affecting implementation of the law. It appears that he is planning a conference later this year to teach people how to prepare to take advantage of the new form of funding the moment it is available. It costs just over $300 to attend the conference, and I look forward to attending.
I also look forward to keeping up with future Gordon Firemark Entertainment Law Update podcasts. A total of seven are available on iTunes right now, and I’d love to dig up archives for other episodes applicable to my business interests.
Thanks for reading!
Profitably yours,
Jed.
Firemark, G. (2012, February 1). Episode 28 - Political campaigns, combat helicopters, and Batmobiles. Entertainment Law Update Podcast. Podcast retrieved from iTunes.
Firemark, G. (2012, March 29). Episode 29 - 360 deals, rights of publicity, and more. Entertainment Law Update Podcast. Podcast retrieved from iTunes.
Firemark, G. (2012, April 29). Episode 30 - JOBS Act, crowdfunding, limited editions. Entertainment Law Update Podcast. Podcast retrieved from iTunes.
One can learn a lot from experienced entertainment attorneys like Gordon. Several lessons stood out from the three podcasts.
While my company has not been involved in production of the Batman films, I did meet the person who built the Batmobile for The Dark Knight. He was very proud of the design, and said he would let me see it. He also created the Speed Racer car, which I did get to see in person. In Episode 28, Mr. Firemark discusses legal issues that arose when a company made and sold Batmobile lookalikes. The company claimed it was a fair use because the vehicle was functional and therefore not subject to trademark law, but the courts decided certain features of a vehicle’s design could be trademarked. Therefore, it is necessary to license a unique design before producing and selling a lookalike vehicle. My question is, who owns the right to the Batmobile likeness, the comic creator or the person/vehicle artist who made the Batmobile car for the movie? This is a question I should consider if I hire this person to build cars for future films.
Episode 29 deals with 360 deals. Some record companies are in trouble for charging fees for putting together an entire 360 deal, when their contracts only entitle them to commissions on part of the deal. In one case, charging the fee led to canceling of the entire contract and loss of all fees, but this does not appear to be the trend. It is important for my company to make sure any fees are fully outlined in my contracts, so I don’t invalidate my contract by charging a fee that is not allowed. This is just one more reason why a good entertainment attorney should be involved in any major transaction.
One option my company has looked at for funding certain projects is crowd funding. Episode 30 discusses the JOBS Act (Jumpstart Our Business Startups), which is intended to jumpstart businesses through crowd funding. Mr. Firemark goes through the many challenges that are currently affecting implementation of the law. It appears that he is planning a conference later this year to teach people how to prepare to take advantage of the new form of funding the moment it is available. It costs just over $300 to attend the conference, and I look forward to attending.
I also look forward to keeping up with future Gordon Firemark Entertainment Law Update podcasts. A total of seven are available on iTunes right now, and I’d love to dig up archives for other episodes applicable to my business interests.
Thanks for reading!
Profitably yours,
Jed.
Sunday, September 2, 2012
Three Controversies
1. One of the latest legal controversies in America is the design patent battle between Apple and Samsung that came to a close last week.
A number of analysts and investors have weighed in on the result, one that favored Apple in an American court:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-25/analysts-investors-comment-on-apple-samsung-verdict.html?cmpid=taboola.tech.art
Professor Michael Risch of Villanova University, brought up one of the most intriguing points of discussion. While most analysts focus on the impact of the verdict on competition like Google’s Android platform and Microsoft’s Windows mobile platform or on Apple’s ability to safeguard its valuable intellectual property, Risch seems to think “Not being able to copy may make [Samsung] do better things than Apple.”
I agree, and believe that, while companies should be able to license certain aspects of technology to promote healthy competition, they should also have to rely on their heads somewhat and innovate new value into the “conversation” of a competitive marketplace. Where would video games be if Nintendo had not reinvented gaming with the Wii? Both Microsoft and Sony have been forced to put out peripherals called Kinect and Move just to compete.
The design patent victory by Apple, while a seeming victory today, may actually hurt them in the future when competitors come up with innovative and mass market designs before those features occur to Apple. For now, investors seem to think Apple got the better end of the stick.
2. By way of contrast, a second legal controversy occurred between the same two companies in a very different forum with a different result. While Apple won the fight in North American courts, Samsung appears to have won a separately filed, but less important verdict against Apple in Japanese courts:
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/high_tech/1700/08-31-2012/20120831002001_09.html
According to this article, Samsung using “the synchronizing technology that allows media players to share data with personal computers” does not infringe on Apple’s patents.
While a relatively minor victory for Samsung, it could be a positive victory for consumers who really ought to be able to find that feature in any mobile device, just implemented and coded in a unique way.
I am curious whether the forums the two companies chose to file in had anything to do with the disparate results. Apple’s victory came in a court just miles from their headquarters. Japan certainly seems like it might be a more friendly forum to a Japanese company, even though people in Japan are big fans of Apple products.
Were these cases really decided on their merits or are geography and national loyalty the reasons major legal precedents have just been set? Only the courts know for sure.
3. In other entertainment news, this time from the publishing industry, a Navy Seal may be about to be sued by the Pentagon for writing a book, No Easy Day, that tells a different story about the killing of Osama Bin Laden than that told by the White House:
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/a/w/1152/08-31-2012/20120831065000_06.html
The Pentagon claims breach of contract because the soldier, Matt Bissonnette, agreed in writing not to divulge classified information, and a few copies of the book have already been distributed and paid for. Whether there is classified information in the book or not, it seems like a valuable service to let the American people know what really happened. If Barack Obama or his staff is lying, we ought to know about it even if someone at the Pentagon wants to call it Classified.
As a Veteran myself who had a Top Secret security clearance while in the military, I understand the importance of operational security. We don’t want soldiers still serving to be compromised in any way or put in danger. I also believe strongly that certain information should be in the hands of the people who are paying for it, the American taxpayers.
Is classified information a type of trade secret of the US government? Should we view classified information and trade secrets/other intellectual property as analogous or completely different things? Where should the government’s right to keep things secret end and the public’s right to know begin?
The author of the book is a patriot and war hero, not simply someone trying to make a quick buck off a book at the expense of fellow Navy Seals. He should be treated as such. Unless there is something really important (force protection issues) about what is divulged in the book, the Pentagon should let the author go and even support his book. A cooperative approach might even help them recruit new heroes.
If Hollywood is not prosecuted for making movies about fake Navy Seals fighting terrorists, why should we go after this Navy Seal who fought real ones? Don’t Tom Clancy and John Grisham fiction give terrorists at least as many ideas as the truth? If anything, the patriotic exploits in No Easy Day might discourage terrorists from messing with our sharpest soldiers and the people and ideals they support and defend.
That said, Bissonnette should have included the Navy in the book publishing process much earlier in the process, and the military should in general keep soldiers aware of their obligations to keep certain information secret for the good of those serving and the country they serve.
A number of analysts and investors have weighed in on the result, one that favored Apple in an American court:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-25/analysts-investors-comment-on-apple-samsung-verdict.html?cmpid=taboola.tech.art
Professor Michael Risch of Villanova University, brought up one of the most intriguing points of discussion. While most analysts focus on the impact of the verdict on competition like Google’s Android platform and Microsoft’s Windows mobile platform or on Apple’s ability to safeguard its valuable intellectual property, Risch seems to think “Not being able to copy may make [Samsung] do better things than Apple.”
I agree, and believe that, while companies should be able to license certain aspects of technology to promote healthy competition, they should also have to rely on their heads somewhat and innovate new value into the “conversation” of a competitive marketplace. Where would video games be if Nintendo had not reinvented gaming with the Wii? Both Microsoft and Sony have been forced to put out peripherals called Kinect and Move just to compete.
The design patent victory by Apple, while a seeming victory today, may actually hurt them in the future when competitors come up with innovative and mass market designs before those features occur to Apple. For now, investors seem to think Apple got the better end of the stick.
2. By way of contrast, a second legal controversy occurred between the same two companies in a very different forum with a different result. While Apple won the fight in North American courts, Samsung appears to have won a separately filed, but less important verdict against Apple in Japanese courts:
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/high_tech/1700/08-31-2012/20120831002001_09.html
According to this article, Samsung using “the synchronizing technology that allows media players to share data with personal computers” does not infringe on Apple’s patents.
While a relatively minor victory for Samsung, it could be a positive victory for consumers who really ought to be able to find that feature in any mobile device, just implemented and coded in a unique way.
I am curious whether the forums the two companies chose to file in had anything to do with the disparate results. Apple’s victory came in a court just miles from their headquarters. Japan certainly seems like it might be a more friendly forum to a Japanese company, even though people in Japan are big fans of Apple products.
Were these cases really decided on their merits or are geography and national loyalty the reasons major legal precedents have just been set? Only the courts know for sure.
3. In other entertainment news, this time from the publishing industry, a Navy Seal may be about to be sued by the Pentagon for writing a book, No Easy Day, that tells a different story about the killing of Osama Bin Laden than that told by the White House:
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/a/w/1152/08-31-2012/20120831065000_06.html
The Pentagon claims breach of contract because the soldier, Matt Bissonnette, agreed in writing not to divulge classified information, and a few copies of the book have already been distributed and paid for. Whether there is classified information in the book or not, it seems like a valuable service to let the American people know what really happened. If Barack Obama or his staff is lying, we ought to know about it even if someone at the Pentagon wants to call it Classified.
As a Veteran myself who had a Top Secret security clearance while in the military, I understand the importance of operational security. We don’t want soldiers still serving to be compromised in any way or put in danger. I also believe strongly that certain information should be in the hands of the people who are paying for it, the American taxpayers.
Is classified information a type of trade secret of the US government? Should we view classified information and trade secrets/other intellectual property as analogous or completely different things? Where should the government’s right to keep things secret end and the public’s right to know begin?
The author of the book is a patriot and war hero, not simply someone trying to make a quick buck off a book at the expense of fellow Navy Seals. He should be treated as such. Unless there is something really important (force protection issues) about what is divulged in the book, the Pentagon should let the author go and even support his book. A cooperative approach might even help them recruit new heroes.
If Hollywood is not prosecuted for making movies about fake Navy Seals fighting terrorists, why should we go after this Navy Seal who fought real ones? Don’t Tom Clancy and John Grisham fiction give terrorists at least as many ideas as the truth? If anything, the patriotic exploits in No Easy Day might discourage terrorists from messing with our sharpest soldiers and the people and ideals they support and defend.
That said, Bissonnette should have included the Navy in the book publishing process much earlier in the process, and the military should in general keep soldiers aware of their obligations to keep certain information secret for the good of those serving and the country they serve.
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Adventures in Product and Consumer Development
Most people in business have heard of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software that helps vendors sell to and keep track of the needs and profiles of their customers and potential customers. Such tools give vendors significant power in tailoring marketing messages to prospective users and purchasers of their products. There is a new trend developing in response to this targeted and one sided power, VRM.
Since the advent of Google, customers are increasingly picky about where and when we (they) are contacted and would prefer to be reached only when we (they) are looking to buy. Vendor Relationship Management (VRM) is a growing suite of tools to help consumers control and communicate preferences to vendors.
One example of this is like "do not call" lists on steroids. Just as you go to the post office and request a change of address card, these tools make it easy to do the same with your email, shipping preferences, etc. A single update allows all of your favorite companies to switch simultaneously to a new communication channel with you. Customers are going from being herded like cattle with advertising and marketing prods to being in control, and its the next big thing.
What if when you buy a car, you get to decide on the features before it ever gets to the dealership? Some companies already offer this, but what if you also get a say in price, without dealing with a sketchy salesman? Product managers of tomorrow get to deal with the (welcome) headache and opportunity of dealing with a thousand variant requests and sets of terms. As customer advocates, they also get to help bring this customer-in-control culture to their company cultures, or risk getting left behind.
Dominos already has a system in place that allows you to order truly custom pizzas online that are far more personal and tasty than what a traditional menu could have room for. I can buy a wheat-free pizza with pepperoni, steak, fresh tomato chunks, three kinds of cheese, and four other toppings, and have it delivered with a mouse click. I'll never walk into a Little Caesar's again!
What does this mean for Hollywood? Studios already commonly hold focus groups to determine the perfect ending, but what happens when customers can selectively filter out trailers unlikely to appeal to them before even seeing them, from the whole Internet? For example, I might select "no movies with strong language." (Expect this control to be built right into your Chrome browser or Google account.) Will this begin to shape how Hollywood movies are made and what content is included? What if I only opt to hear about a film after three of my friends have bought tickets or "liked" the trailer?
As a consumer who has been bandied about by all sorts of advertising, I welcome the change, and, given the option, might even opt out of all advertising altogether.
Of course, I wouldn't mind more customization in my movie ticket purchases. What if when I buy my ticket on Fandango I can also order my popcorn and non-soda drink? (Maybe a Vitamin Water.) Of course, the whole purchase and redemption will be managed by my virtual wallet on my iPhone 6.
Some people even think the pricing system for tickets will change. For example, you might bid on tickets to get into a first screening. Prices may go up and down to maximize theater seat use, which helps theater owners the most since they have more people to sell popcorn to. What if you bring five people to a theater and each buys a drink? Could your ticket price change?
There is a great book that I just downloaded that appears to delve into some of these broad issues. It was just released in audio yesterday and is called The Intention Economy: When Customers Take Charge by Doc Searls. Find it on Audible.com. You get the book and someone to read it to you!
Another trend: Have you noticed that as Apple's products have evolved, so have its consumers? This is really the case in all industries. Apple both anticipates and responds to changes in consumer demand. Consumers don't always know what we want until some visionary shows us. Three months later, it's tough to go back!
If you trace the development of any product or category, it evolves in response to or in anticipation of people evolving. Not only have products evolved, but we have changed, too.
I'm not saying we are soon going to have three thumbs to help us deal with a new controller from Nintendo, but our sophistication seems to break new ground every time supply and demand play another round. I look at pictures of actresses from the eighties and wonder how anyone ever fell for a girl with hair like that! Apparently men were just as bad.
All of this leads me to one more question: Are consumer preferences doomed to change forever, or are there certain principles and styles and choices that are and will remain timeless? Audrey Hepburn seems to have avoided the eighties type hair disaster altogether, and is still considered stylish. Is there a golden mean of product development that industry may someday reach, or are people as hungry for change as we are for perfection? A walk through the woods or on a beach suggests that we are all fickle, and perhaps nature alone understands timelessness. At least there will always be something new to blog about!
Since the advent of Google, customers are increasingly picky about where and when we (they) are contacted and would prefer to be reached only when we (they) are looking to buy. Vendor Relationship Management (VRM) is a growing suite of tools to help consumers control and communicate preferences to vendors.
One example of this is like "do not call" lists on steroids. Just as you go to the post office and request a change of address card, these tools make it easy to do the same with your email, shipping preferences, etc. A single update allows all of your favorite companies to switch simultaneously to a new communication channel with you. Customers are going from being herded like cattle with advertising and marketing prods to being in control, and its the next big thing.
What if when you buy a car, you get to decide on the features before it ever gets to the dealership? Some companies already offer this, but what if you also get a say in price, without dealing with a sketchy salesman? Product managers of tomorrow get to deal with the (welcome) headache and opportunity of dealing with a thousand variant requests and sets of terms. As customer advocates, they also get to help bring this customer-in-control culture to their company cultures, or risk getting left behind.
Dominos already has a system in place that allows you to order truly custom pizzas online that are far more personal and tasty than what a traditional menu could have room for. I can buy a wheat-free pizza with pepperoni, steak, fresh tomato chunks, three kinds of cheese, and four other toppings, and have it delivered with a mouse click. I'll never walk into a Little Caesar's again!
What does this mean for Hollywood? Studios already commonly hold focus groups to determine the perfect ending, but what happens when customers can selectively filter out trailers unlikely to appeal to them before even seeing them, from the whole Internet? For example, I might select "no movies with strong language." (Expect this control to be built right into your Chrome browser or Google account.) Will this begin to shape how Hollywood movies are made and what content is included? What if I only opt to hear about a film after three of my friends have bought tickets or "liked" the trailer?
As a consumer who has been bandied about by all sorts of advertising, I welcome the change, and, given the option, might even opt out of all advertising altogether.
Of course, I wouldn't mind more customization in my movie ticket purchases. What if when I buy my ticket on Fandango I can also order my popcorn and non-soda drink? (Maybe a Vitamin Water.) Of course, the whole purchase and redemption will be managed by my virtual wallet on my iPhone 6.
Some people even think the pricing system for tickets will change. For example, you might bid on tickets to get into a first screening. Prices may go up and down to maximize theater seat use, which helps theater owners the most since they have more people to sell popcorn to. What if you bring five people to a theater and each buys a drink? Could your ticket price change?
There is a great book that I just downloaded that appears to delve into some of these broad issues. It was just released in audio yesterday and is called The Intention Economy: When Customers Take Charge by Doc Searls. Find it on Audible.com. You get the book and someone to read it to you!
Another trend: Have you noticed that as Apple's products have evolved, so have its consumers? This is really the case in all industries. Apple both anticipates and responds to changes in consumer demand. Consumers don't always know what we want until some visionary shows us. Three months later, it's tough to go back!
If you trace the development of any product or category, it evolves in response to or in anticipation of people evolving. Not only have products evolved, but we have changed, too.
I'm not saying we are soon going to have three thumbs to help us deal with a new controller from Nintendo, but our sophistication seems to break new ground every time supply and demand play another round. I look at pictures of actresses from the eighties and wonder how anyone ever fell for a girl with hair like that! Apparently men were just as bad.
All of this leads me to one more question: Are consumer preferences doomed to change forever, or are there certain principles and styles and choices that are and will remain timeless? Audrey Hepburn seems to have avoided the eighties type hair disaster altogether, and is still considered stylish. Is there a golden mean of product development that industry may someday reach, or are people as hungry for change as we are for perfection? A walk through the woods or on a beach suggests that we are all fickle, and perhaps nature alone understands timelessness. At least there will always be something new to blog about!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)